Re: [messengers] Canadian non-competition clauses?

Date: Tue Feb 09 02:40:10 2010
From: "yogi at" <yogi@xxxxxxxxxx>

From the eyes of the clients.

did you offer a better service that THEY went with?
did you steal (or even poach with cut prices) them?

cause if it was the clients choice...

caveat emptor

also did read some interesting stuff on wiki too

I cannot offer any real legal advice as an Attorney can be one of 2 jobs
here, a barrister or a solicitor.

Julian 'Yogi' Somosi

-----Original Message-----
From: messengers-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:messengers-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Corey Hilliard
Sent: 09 February 2010 12:11
Cc: messengers@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [messengers] Canadian non-competition clauses?

Regardless of the reasons why you left the courier company, taking a recent
employer's clients is often considered unethical in the business world. As
Canada may have unique laws in these matters, you should find a lawyer to
advise you pro bono (free). Maintenance of a separate business that competed
with your previous employer at the same time you worked there will put you
in a bad position if it is mentioned in court. Your best hope is that the
non-compete gets thrown out. Otherwise you may have to pick a new job or

Corey the Courier

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Contact a less expensive attorney.
> Any advice you get off a mail list is not solid legal advice. (I'm sure
> already know that)
> That being said, in any contract in the states you need consideration by
> both parties and employment is rarely considered consideration for any
> non-compete clause.
> Good luck.
> Mark
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jace Brien" <treebeard1722@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mark Loeppky" <leposuction@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <messengers@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 8:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [messengers] Canadian non-competition clauses?
>  Those contracts usually don't hold up in cpourt in the states.  Has
>> had experience with this?
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Mark Loeppky <leposuction@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>  Happy Friday to all.
>>> On December 1st I was fired by the company I had been working for for
>>> past 7 years due to irreconcilable differences between the dispatcher
>>> myself. On account  of having nothing but positive relationships with
>>> former
>>> clients,  I had no trouble at all acquiring clients for Steel Horse
>>> Courier,
>>> the Company I started up over a year ago.
>>> long story short I am now being "sued" by Dasher Courier, under the
>>> umbrella
>>> of  Direct Integrated Transportation and Canada Cartage(although they
>>> have
>>> yet to actually contact legal council, and I have a waayyy to expensive
>>> lawyer). They want me to cease and desist.
>>> The contract I signed is illegal because:
>>> -It was signed with an opportunity to seek legal advice and signed under
>>> duress. (we were given 5 minutes to meet a guy in a pick up truck to
>>> the contract or else we would be fired immediately)
>>> -I never received a copy of the contract for myself.
>>> -Lots of ambiguities within the contract render the fucker invalid
>>> anyhow.
>>> If this has to go to trial, It may cost upwards of 15,000 beans in legal
>>> fees and court costs to save 7-8000 per year that I would bill the
>>> client.
>>> If anyone has ever gone indy and taken on their former employer under
>>> canadaian law, and can offer me some advice I would love to hear it. To
>>> all
>>> else, enjoy the weekend.
>>> -Lep
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Messengers mailing list
>>> Messengers@xxxxxxxxx
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> Messengers mailing list
>> Messengers@xxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> Messengers mailing list
> Messengers@xxxxxxxxx
Messengers mailing list