Re: [messengers] CMWC2013 MEXICO DF

Date: 23 May 2011 01:59:03 +0200
From: luk keller <lukbrokenheart@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Ok ok ok
A lot of folks (including myself) would like to see a CMWC happen in Mexico DF. But I'd like to point out that there isn't really a connection between the bid put in in Panajachel and the recent post from Joaquin. There is no "you guys put in a great bid in Guate" in this one.
This time it is actually messengers interested in getting into the global connection. None of this people have ever been to a CMWC. There is a lot of homework to be done and a lot of assistance from the world wide community needed to give them the chance to put together a proper bid.
If we have to choose if we wanna go to Bruchsal or Mexico City for a CMWC... I guess people will vote for Mexico City no matter what. But if Bruchsal has a proper bid and Mexico City just an appealing taste of adventure at least I will feel obligated to vote for Bruchsal.
> From: torontocouriergirl@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 22:44:55 -0400
> To: bicimensajeros@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: messengers@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [messengers] CMWC2013 MEXICO DF
> Yes!!! Do it! It would be phenomenal to go to mexico city! And you guys put in a great bid in Guate also. It was a rely close vote. I say "yes!" to mexico city 2013. 
> ....provided the rapture doesn't take us all tomorrow. 
> My two cents. 
> On 2011-05-20, at 5:49 PM, joaquin sanchez <bicimensajeros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > those of you who went to guatemala for the worlds remember that Mexico city placed a bid to host the CMWC2012. i was there supporting the idea because i was then working in san cristobal, chiapas (mexico) ... i guess one of the reasons the bid didn't win was because there were no messengers from mexico city there and then (and also because chicago did a great job)... i'm now working in mexico city with and we believe we can do it for 2013. what do you guys think? should i present our bid again in warsaw with our action plan? cheers
> > 
> > jo.aquin (ex paris' urban cycle, now
> > _______________________________________________
> > Messengers mailing list
> > Messengers@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Messengers mailing list
> Messengers@xxxxxxxxx