Re: [messengers] Fwd: Voting system at CMWC Mexico

Date: 1 May 2014 00:36:14 -0000
From: Leah <torontocouriergirl@xxxxxxxxx>

The only issue I see is in the event of a tie. I think if that happens we will have the host cities give a final appeal then we will vote in the old fashion of picking a side, literally. 

Unless there are some major objections I think that this is an excellent opportunity to test out the system. If it fails we go back to the current method and go back to the drawing board for next year. 

My 2 pesos

> On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:28 PM, london courier emergency fund <londoncourieremergencyfund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Forwarded from Safa:
>  On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 12:19 PM, Willy Wonker
> <fetologist@xxxxxxxxx<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','fetologist@xxxxxxxxx');>>
> wrote:
> Hi,
> The voting system to decides who hosts CMWCs is currently being discussed
> and will be a major topic at the open forum.
> I would like to propose that CMWC Mexico use a new system at our
> championships.  We do not wish to change the schedule and therefore the
> open forums will remain on Friday and Monday.  We would like to change how
> the city is decided upon and have less tension and more time to decide upon
> other matters at the second open forum.
> We propose that the decision as to which city hosts the 2016 CMWC is
> decided by majority ballot vote.
> Final registration closes on Saturday morning, after which we will print
> the list of all registered racers and their numbers.  Voting can take place
> on Saturday during the main race qualifiers and on Sunday during the main
> race (exact hours yet to be defined). You put the city's name on a piece of
> paper and put it in to the box which will be monitored by an official, your
> name gets crossed off the list and that is your one and only vote cast.
> Any votes that are for a city that has not put in a bid or have more than
> one city on will be discarded.  We would be able to announce the 2016 host
> city winner at the prize giving.
> Of course it would be a good idea for host cities to add material to
> registration packs or make it available to participants before Saturday. We
> will be happy to add any city's info to our rego packs but will not be
> responsible for any printing or work other than putting it inside rego
> packs.
> Unless there are major concerns form the community I believe we can go
> ahead with this system this year as the current system is a bit of a mess.
> The open forums can determine future systems and monitor how the system
> worked this time.
> - Safa
> _______________________________________________
> Messengers mailing list
> Messengers@xxxxxxxxx